ISWC OpenIR  > 水保所知识产出(1956---)
散孔材与环孔材树种枝干、叶水力学特性的比较研究
其他题名Comparison of hydraulic traits in branches and leaves of diffuse-and ringporous
左力翔; 李俊辉; 李秧秧; 赵丽敏
2012
发表期刊生态学报
卷号32期号:16页码:5087-5094
摘要为揭示散孔材与环孔材树种树木水分生理特性的差异,选取了常见的3种散孔材落叶树种(毛白杨、法国梧桐和樱花)和3种环孔材落叶树种(刺槐、合欢和白蜡),研究了其枝干与叶水力学性质的差异及其协调性。结果表明:3种环孔材树种枝干横截面积基础上的最大比导水率(Ks-max)大于3种散孔材树种,但其木质部对空穴化的脆弱性(P50branch)高于散孔材树种,6种树木枝干的水分传输能力和抵抗空穴化能力之间存在一种相互制约的权衡关系。3种散孔材与3种环孔材树种的叶最大水力导度(Kl-max)和水力脆弱性(P50leaf)并无显著差异;对于3种散孔材树种,叶的水力脆弱性要高于枝干,但对3种环孔材树种而言,枝干的水力脆弱性要高于叶。6种树木枝干和叶的水力学性质(Kmax、P50)之间并无相关关系。这些结果表明:散孔材与环孔材树种的枝干水力学特性有明显差异,但叶水力学特性无差异;枝干与叶水力学性质之间是相互独立的。
其他摘要Angiosperm tree species in temperate regions are broadly divided into diffuse-porous and ring-porous species
based on their xylem anatomy. Diffuse-porous species show very little distinction between the diameter of vessel elements in
early versus late wood,while ring-porous species have a bimodal distribution of vessel diameters associated with large,early
season vessels and small late season vessels. These anatomical differences result in differences between these two kinds of
tree species in stem water transport capacity and in the vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation. However,it is not clear
if diffuse-porous and ring-porous species show differences in leaf hydraulic traits. Water transport resistance in leaves
accounts for 30%—80% of the total hydraulic resistance of the whole-plant water transport pathway,and relatively few
studies have focused on leaf hydraulics owing to methodological barriers; hence,elucidating the differences between diffuseporous
versus ring-porous species in leaf hydraulics and in leaf hydraulic trait coordination with stem hydraulic traits can be
helpful in demonstrating the differences between diffuse-porous and ring-porous tree species in plant water use,geological
distribution,leaf phenology and ecological adaptation.
We compared hydraulic traits of branches and leaves in three diffuse-porous deciduous tree species ( Populus  tomentosa,Platanus hispanica,Prunus serrulata) and three ring-porous deciduous tree species ( Robinia pseudoacacia,
Albizia julibrissin,Fraxinus chinensis ) growing in northwestern China. Branch and leaf water transport capacity was
evaluated by their maximum hydraulic conductivities ( Kmax
) ,and the hydraulic vulnerability was evaluated with P50,which
corresponds to the branch or leaf water potential at 50% loss of maximum hydraulic conductivities. For stems,P50 was
inferred from the vulnerability curves generated by air injection or bench dehydration method. For leaves,the curves were
constructed by measuring hydraulic conductance ( Kleaf
) in leaves rehydrated from a range of water potentials ( ψleaf
) . Kleaf
was measured by assessing kinetics of ψleaf relaxation upon leaf rehydration.
The results showed that branch cross-sectional area-based maximum specific conductivities ( Ks-max
) of the ring-porous
species were greater than those of the diffuse-porous species. Ring-porous species were more vulnerable to cavitation ( P50
branch
) than diffuse-porous species and a tradeoff relationship was evident between Ks-max and P50branch in branches. No
differences were found between leaf water transport capacities ( Kl-max
) or the vulnerability to hydraulic dysfunction ( P50leaf
)
in the two species types,and there was no tradeoff relationship between Kl-max and P50leaf . In the three diffuse-porous
species,leaves were more vulnerable than branches to water stress-induced dysfunction,but in the ring-porous species,
branches were more vulnerable than leaves. Pearson correlation analysis indicated that there was no correlation between
branch and leaf hydraulic traits ( Kmax and P50) in the six investigated woody species. These results suggest that in our
study: ( 1 ) diffuse-porous and ring-porous species diverged mainly in branch but not in leaf hydraulics,so that leaf
hydraulics alone cannot be used to explain the differences between these two tree types in ecological function and
adaptation. ( 2) Branch and leaf hydraulic traits were relatively independent and may be correlated with branch and leaf
structure,respectively.
关键词散孔材 Diffuse-porous Species 环孔材 Ring-porous Species 枝干和叶 Branch And Leaf 水力学性质 Hydraulic Traits
语种中文
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符sbir.nwafu.edu.cn/handle/361005/5416
专题水保所知识产出(1956---)
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
左力翔,李俊辉,李秧秧,等. 散孔材与环孔材树种枝干、叶水力学特性的比较研究[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(16):5087-5094.
APA 左力翔,李俊辉,李秧秧,&赵丽敏.(2012).散孔材与环孔材树种枝干、叶水力学特性的比较研究.生态学报,32(16),5087-5094.
MLA 左力翔,et al."散孔材与环孔材树种枝干、叶水力学特性的比较研究".生态学报 32.16(2012):5087-5094.
条目包含的文件 下载所有文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
散孔材与环孔材树种枝干_叶水力学特性的比(547KB) 开放获取使用许可浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[左力翔]的文章
[李俊辉]的文章
[李秧秧]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[左力翔]的文章
[李俊辉]的文章
[李秧秧]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[左力翔]的文章
[李俊辉]的文章
[李秧秧]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 散孔材与环孔材树种枝干_叶水力学特性的比较研究_左力翔.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。