基于最小数据集的黄土高原矿区复垦土壤质量评价

ISWC OpenIR > 水保所知识产出(1956---)

	基于最小数据集的黄土高原矿区复垦土壤质量评价
	李鹏飞 1,2,3; 张兴昌 2; 郝明德 2; 张燕江 4; 崔勇兴 2,3; 朱世雷 4
	2019
发表期刊	农业工程学报
卷号	35 期号:16 页码:265-273
摘要	矿产开发影响了土壤质量，特别是在黄土高原生态脆弱地区。通过植被恢复能够改善矿区复垦土壤质量。为了揭示矿区复垦土壤质量在植被恢复过程中的变化，该文以黑岱沟矿区排土场不同恢复年限不同植被类型、未复垦地和周边自然植被恢复区为研究对象，选取 21 项理化生指标作为总数据集（total data set，TDS），运用主成分分析（principal component analysis，PCA）结合 Norm 值构建评价指标最小数据集（minimum data set，MDS），通过非线性（non-Linear， NL）和线性（linear，L）两种评价方法对研究区土壤质量进行了评价。研究表明：黄土高原北部典型矿区复垦土壤质量评价指标 MDS 包括粉粒百分比、有机质、速效磷、钠吸附比和微生物碳；2 种评价方法下，植被恢复均对复垦土壤质量指数（soil quality index，SQI）有了显著提升（P < 0.05），复垦 20 a 灌木 SQI 高于复垦 10 a 灌木 SQI，复垦 12 a 草本 SQI 高于复垦 20 a 草本 SQI，然而所有复垦土壤 SQI 均未达到自然植被恢复土壤 SQI；由于非线性土壤质量评价方法（SQI-NL）具有更大的土壤质量指数变化区间和变异系数，此外，在 SQI-NL 和线性土壤质量（SQI-L）评价两种方法下，MDS 和 TDS 之间决定系数分别为 0.911 和 0.866，因此，非线性土壤质量评价方法在该区域具有更好的适用性，并且最小数据集能够较准确地进行土壤质量评价。
其他摘要	Mineral exploitation affects soil quality especially in the ecologically fragile areas the Loess Plateau. The quality of soil can be improved by vegetation restoration. In order to reveal the changes of soil quality in the process of vegetation restoration in the reclaimed land of mining, we took Heidaigou mining area and the surrounding natural vegetation restoration area as the research area, and selected 21 physicochemical indicators as the total data set (TDS). The minimum data set (MDS) was constructed by using principal component analysis (PCA) and Norm values. Two evaluation methods, non-linear (NL) and Linear (L), were used to evaluate the soil quality in this study area. The results show that the minimum data set include percentage of silt (Silt), organic matter (OM), available phosphorus (AP), sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and microbial carbon (MBC). It indicates that in addition to conventional nutrients and physical properties, soil quality in this region is restricted by salinization and microbial biomass. The order of weight of MDS was: MBC (0.241) > OM (0.235) > AP (0.193) > Silt (0.174) > SAR (0.157). The applicability of the two evaluation methods is verified and we find that the overall spatial pattern of soil quality obtained by the two methods is similar, but there are still differences in details. According to the analysis results of the two evaluation methods, soil quality index (SQI) were all significantly improved by vegetation restoration (P < 0.05).Under different vegetation restoration types, the average value of the SQI-NL based on the MDS was sorted as follows: natural vegetation restoration land (NL, 0.587) > shrubs reclamation for 20 years (RLS 20, 0.479) > herbs reclamation for 12 years (RLH 12, 0.455) > shrubs reclamation for 10 years (RLS 10, 0.453) > herbs reclamation for 20 years (RLH 20, 0.424) > arbors reclamation for 20 years (RLA 20, 0.364) > and unreclaimed land (UL, 0.262) (P < 0.05), the average value of the SQI-L based on the MDS was sorted as follows: NL (0.522) > RLS 20 (0.444), > RLS 10 (0.412), > RLH 12 (0.401) > RLH 20 (0.400) > RLA 20 (0.326) > UL (0.228) (P < 0.05). In summary, different vegetation restoration years and different vegetation restoration types significantly improved the SQI of reclaimed land of mine areas (P < 0.05); however, the SQI of all reclaimed land has not reached that of natural vegetation restoration land, which indicates that the soil quality restoration of reclaimed land of mine areas is a long process. Since the SQI – NL method has a wider value range of SQI and coefficient of variation, this method has better applicability in this region than SQI-L, this is because 1) in the case of a wide range of soil quality index, the identification and classification accuracy of soil quality can be improved, which is conducive to the accurate evaluation of soil quality status and the timely detection of problems; 2) the coefficient of variation represents the sensitivity of SQI to changes in different environmental conditions, the higher the sensitivity of soil quality index to changes in environmental conditions is, the clearer the influence factors of soil quality change can be reflected, thus more effectively guiding the scientific management of soil quality improvement. Under the SQI-NL and SQI-L methods, the determination coefficients between MDS and TDS are 0.911 and 0.866, respectively, indicating that MDS can accurately replace TDS for soil quality evaluation. This study summarizes the MDS and soil quality evaluation methods suitable for the reclamation soil quality evaluation in the mining areas of the Loess Plateau, and recommends the future research and application in the same area and soil conditions.
关键词	复垦植被土壤质量评价方法矿区主成分分析最小数据集黄土高原
收录类别	中文核心期刊要目总览
语种	中文
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	sbir.nwafu.edu.cn/handle/361005/9776
专题	水保所知识产出(1956---)
作者单位	1.水利部黄河水利委员会黄河上中游管理局 2.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室 3.中国科学院大学 4.西北农林科技大学资源环境学院
第一作者单位	中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	李鹏飞,张兴昌,郝明德,等. 基于最小数据集的黄土高原矿区复垦土壤质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(16):265-273.
APA	李鹏飞,张兴昌,郝明德,张燕江,崔勇兴,&朱世雷.(2019).基于最小数据集的黄土高原矿区复垦土壤质量评价.农业工程学报,35(16),265-273.
MLA	李鹏飞,et al."基于最小数据集的黄土高原矿区复垦土壤质量评价".农业工程学报 35.16(2019):265-273.

条目包含的文件		下载所有文件
文件名称/大小	文献类型	版本类型	开放类型	使用许可
基于最小数据集的黄土高原矿区复垦土壤质量（1141KB）	期刊论文	作者接受稿	开放获取	CC BY-NC-SA	浏览下载