工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响
其他题名Influence of Engineering Disturbance on Soil Anti-Erodibility and Soil Anti-Scourability of Loess
王龙1,2; 张连科3; 马伊明3; 杜峰1; 徐学选1
文章类型中文核心,一级学报
2021-08
发表期刊水土保持学报
ISSN1009-2242
通讯作者邮箱lk.zhang@gsas.ac.cn ; xuxuexuan@nwsuaf.edu.cn
卷号35期号:4页码:1-8
摘要

为研究工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性和抗冲性的影响,以兰州市城关区北山为研究区,选取1年填方样地(T1a)、5年填方样地(T5a)、7年挖方样地(W7a)和天然草地(C)4个样地采原状土样,在室内使用干筛-湿筛法测定土壤团聚体相关指标研究土壤抗蚀性,用抗冲槽研究土壤抗冲性,并分析了影响土壤抗蚀性和抗冲性的因素。结果显示,各样地表层(010 cm)土壤水稳性团聚体的平均质量直径(MWDw)和>0.25 mm团聚体占比[w(δ>0.25)w]表现为C>W7a>T5a>T1a,土壤团聚体破坏率(PAD)表现为T1a>T5a>W7a>C,挖填方样地表层土壤水稳性团聚体颗粒分形维数(Dw)均值为2.82,C样地Dw为2.74,C样地表层土壤的抗蚀性显著强于挖填方样地;T5a和W7a样地中下层土壤(10—20 cm和20—30 cm)MWDww(δ>0.25)w显著低于表层土壤;各样地表层土壤抗冲系数W7a>C>T5a>T1a,W7a和C样地的值较为接近。影响土壤抗蚀性与抗冲性的主要因素有土壤电导率、有机质和根系,土壤生物结皮也会影响土壤抗冲性。这些影响因素与挖填方样地搁置年限密切相关,即随着挖填方样地搁置年限增长,这些因素逐渐发生变化有益于受扰动土壤MWDww(δ>0.25)w的增加以及PAD的降低,其表层土壤的冲刷强度慢慢接近草地。工程扰动会显著降低黄土的抗蚀性和抗冲性,应当做好必要的水土保持措施以降低土壤侵蚀风险。

其他摘要

In order to study the influence of engineering disturbance on the soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourability of loess, taking Beishan, Chengguan District, Lanzhou City as the study area, undisturbed soil samples were collected from four sample plots: 1-year filled plot (T1a), 5-year filled plot (T5a), 7-year dug plot (W7a) and natural grassland plot (C). In the laboratory, the dry-wet sieve method was used to determine the soil aggregate related indicators to study the soil anti-erodibility, and the anti-scour trough was used to study the soil anti-scourability, and the factors affecting the soil anti erodibility and anti——scourability were analyzed. The results showed that the mean weight diameter of soil water-stable aggregates (MWDw) and the proportion of aggregates 0.25 mm [w(δ0.25)w] of the surface layer (0-10 cm) of each sample surface showed CW7aT5aT1a, the soil percentage of aggregates destruction (PAD) showed T1aT5aW7aC. The average of soil water stable aggregates fractal dimension (Dw) in the surface layer of dug and filled plots was 2.82, the Dw of C plot was 2.74. The anti-erodibility of the surface layer soil of the C is significantly stronger than that of the dug and filled site. The MWDw and w(δ0.25)w of the middle and lower soil (10-20 cm and 20-30 cm) of the T5a and W7a plots were significantly lower than those of the surface layer soil. The surface soil anti-erosion coefficient of each sample showed W7aCT5aT1a, and the values of W7a and C sample plots were relatively close. Soil electrical conductivity, organic matter and root system are the main factors affecting soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourabilityin addition, soil biological crusts can also affect soil anti-scourability. These factors are closely related to the shelving years of dug and filled plots. Which means, these factors gradually change as the shelving time of dug and filled plots increases, which is beneficial to the increase of MWDw and w(δ0.25)wand the decrease of PAD of disturbed soil, and the scouring intensity of surface soil is close to that of natural grassland. Engineering disturbance will significantly reduce the soil anti-erodibility and soil anti-scourability of loess, and necessary water and soil conservation measures should be taken to reduce the risk of soil erosion.

关键词挖填方场地 天然草地 抗蚀性 抗冲性 兰州
学科领域农业基础学科 ; 农艺学
学科门类工学::环境科学与工程(可授工学、理学、农学学位)
URL查看原文
收录类别中文核心期刊要目总览
出版地陕西杨凌
语种中文
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符sbir.nwafu.edu.cn/handle/361005/9833
专题水保所2018--2022届毕业生论文(学位论文、期刊论文)
通讯作者张连科; 徐学选
作者单位1.中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所
2.中国科学院大学
3.甘肃省科学院地质自然灾害防治研究所
第一作者单位中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所
通讯作者单位中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
王龙,张连科,马伊明,等. 工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2021,35(4):1-8.
APA 王龙,张连科,马伊明,杜峰,&徐学选.(2021).工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响.水土保持学报,35(4),1-8.
MLA 王龙,et al."工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响".水土保持学报 35.4(2021):1-8.
条目包含的文件 下载所有文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响_王龙(520KB)期刊论文作者接受稿开放获取CC BY-NC-SA浏览 下载
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[王龙]的文章
[张连科]的文章
[马伊明]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[王龙]的文章
[张连科]的文章
[马伊明]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[王龙]的文章
[张连科]的文章
[马伊明]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
文件名: 工程扰动对黄土抗蚀性与抗冲性的影响_王龙.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
此文件暂不支持浏览
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。