ISWC OpenIR  > 水保所科研产出--SCI  > 2017--SCI
Comparison of soil erosion models used to study the Chinese Loess Plateau
Li, Pengfei1,2; Mu, Xingmin1,3; Holden, Joseph2; Wu, Yiping5; Irvine, Brian2; Wang, Fei1,3; Gao, Peng1,3; Zhao, Guangju1,3; Sun, Wenyi1,3; Mu, XM (reprint author), 26 Xinong Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
文章类型Article
2017
发表期刊EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
ISSN0012-8252
通讯作者邮箱xmmu@ms.iswc.ac.cn
卷号170页码:17-30
摘要The Loess Plateau suffers from severe soil erosion that leads to a series of ecological and economic problems such as reduced land productivity, exacerbated rural poverty, decreased biodiversity and sedimentation of the riverbed in the lower reaches of the Yellow River. Soil erosion models are commonly used on the Loess Plateau to help target sustainable land management strategies to control soil erosion. In this study, we compared eleven soil erosion models that were previously used on the Loess Plateau. We studied their prediction accuracy, process representation, data and calibration requirements, and potential application in scenario studies. The selected models consisted of a broad range of model types, structures and scales. The comparison showed that process-based and empirical models did not necessarily yield more accurate results over one another for the Loess Plateau. Among the process-based models, Si' model, WEPP and MMF had the highest prediction accuracy. However, some of the selected models were tested with total sediment load while others were tested with suspended sediment load (i.e. bedload is not included), which is subject to several drawbacks. Research questions that each of the models can address on the Loess Plateau were suggested. Further improvement of soil erosion models for the Loess Plateau should concentrate on enhancing the quality of data for model implementation and testing, incorporating key processes into process-based models according to their aims and scales, comparing models that address the same research questions, and implementing internal and spatial model testing.
关键词Dryland Sediment Land Use Modelling Prediction
学科领域Geology
DOI10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.05.005
URL查看原文
收录类别SCI
出版地AMSTERDAM
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000403428400002
出版者ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
项目资助者National Key Scientific Research Project [2016YFC0402401]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671285]; State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau [A314021402-1603]; U.K. NERC grant [NE/E003168/1] ; National Key Scientific Research Project [2016YFC0402401]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671285]; State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau [A314021402-1603]; U.K. NERC grant [NE/E003168/1]
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符sbir.nwafu.edu.cn/handle/361005/7971
专题水保所科研产出--SCI_2017--SCI
通讯作者Mu, XM (reprint author), 26 Xinong Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
作者单位1.Northwest A&F Univ, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
2.Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Water Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
3.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
4.Minist Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
5.Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Li, Pengfei,Mu, Xingmin,Holden, Joseph,et al. Comparison of soil erosion models used to study the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS,2017,170:17-30.
APA Li, Pengfei.,Mu, Xingmin.,Holden, Joseph.,Wu, Yiping.,Irvine, Brian.,...&Mu, XM .(2017).Comparison of soil erosion models used to study the Chinese Loess Plateau.EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS,170,17-30.
MLA Li, Pengfei,et al."Comparison of soil erosion models used to study the Chinese Loess Plateau".EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS 170(2017):17-30.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Li, Pengfei]的文章
[Mu, Xingmin]的文章
[Holden, Joseph]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Li, Pengfei]的文章
[Mu, Xingmin]的文章
[Holden, Joseph]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Li, Pengfei]的文章
[Mu, Xingmin]的文章
[Holden, Joseph]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。